Are public schools the proper place to consider religion? Although we might agree that religion needs further discussion, a reader and former teacher rightly questioned
how this might happen.
How can we engage in religious studies when so many students struggle with basics like simply reading? she asked. What religions would we choose to teach? These are utterly valid and common questions from teachers, parents, and pedagogues, including myself.
It takes me back to the memory of sitting in a classroom on September 11th of 2001. It was the first time that my predominantly white, suburban, privileged class had ever engaged in such riveting dialogue. Because we were
forced to wake up. Those atrocious acts of religious fundamentalism 'changed the geopolitical-religious landscape forever (Robert J. Nash).' Suddenly, youth and adults alike were compelled to further question 'Why? why had this happened? And 'what do Muslims really believe?' and '
What is the difference between Shiite and Sunni? These events and the continuing war on terrorism around the world makes it clear that we are now forced to reexamine the core of what we teach in schools in order to make students more globally aware.
I return to Professor Robert J. Nash, who teaches religious pluralism at the University level, who writes,
"...Much of what we in the United States believe to be moral - or immoral - is largely a legacy of the Judeo-Christian heritage, as well as of the European Enlightenment." And this is visible today. Let's go to the Texas school board this summer, for a frightening example of how religion in schools can go wrong. Allow me to introduce Cynthia Dunbar, who is part of a coalition of Christian evangelicals who have taken over the Texas School board.
Dunbar and her education board is on the brink of changing what kids in Texas learn. She said;
"We are fighting for our children's education and our nation's future. In Texas we have certain statutory obligations to promote patriotism and to promote the free enterprise system. There seems to have been a move away from a patriotic ideology. There seems to be a denial that this was a nation founded under God. We had to go back and make some corrections."
Some of these corrections drop references to the slave trade, while highlighting the considerable efforts of Confederates and sidelining Thomas Jefferson. This is when religion in schools gets scary. Unfortunately, Texas also has a great influence on text book production because they buy so many. So, if Dunbar is so close to changing history with the strength of her Conservative Christian cohorts, then the rest of us should be able to make some more liberal minded adjustments too?
I don't believe the important dialogue that is needed will come from text books, or policy change, although that would be helpful. It will come from teachers willingness to engage in the subject. It will come from the integration of religion into other core subjects, such as global studies or literature. Hindi and Arabic texts were never in my school curriculum, but are immensely rich. It will come from reading the daily news and then discussing fact. I'm talking religious literacy. Like, what is
Jihad? Perhaps this kind of sensitive exploration can only commence in Secondary School, though I would imagine that the younger the children, the more open they are to speak and listen without fear or dogma. Teachers are masters at speaking with a voice that holds no bias, thus, discussion about religions can be carried forth in casual, factual dialogue.
Nash, in his exploration of religious pluralism often begins by raising the Hindu insight that although religious truth may indeed be one, there are an infinite number of ways to reach, interpret, and practice that truth. Rig Veda, the oldest and most sacred Hindu text puts it this way:
"Ekam sat vipraha bahudha vadanti"
or Truth is one, but the wise call it by many Names" (Rig Veda 1.46.46).
The only way youth will begin to operate with that mind set is when we are free and capable of discussing religion. The best time to do this is when it is relevant; either on the news, or on the day of some religious holiday or ritual. When children see people walking around their city with ash smeared on their foreheads, they should be able to have a discussion in school about its significance. We need our children to be literate for the world they are entering. I am no authority on the subject, or its manifestation in schools, but I am a strong believer in educating citizens for global awareness.